A person who sued Cardi B for $5 million for utilizing his tiger tattoo on her suggestive combine tape cowl now owes the rapper $350,000
- Cardi B received $350,000 in legal professional charges after a years-long authorized battle over her mixtape artwork.
- Kevin Michael Brophy sued Cardi B after a tiger tattoo much like his was used on an album cowl.
- After months of motions, the 2 events agreed that Brophy would pay the $350,000.
Cardi B will gather $350,000 in legal professional’s charges from an Orange County, California, man who accused her in court docket of misappropriating his tiger tattoo for her suggestive 2016 mixtape cowl.
The win for Cardi B, whose actual title is Belcalis Marlenis Almánzar, follows a years-long authorized battle over whether or not or not she was justified in utilizing the tattoo on the quilt of “Gangsta Bitch Music Vol. 1.”
On Tuesday, Decide Cormac J. Carney ordered that Kevin Michael Brophy, the person with the tiger tattoo that sued the Grammy-winning rapper for copyright infringement in 2017, pay the $350,000 plus 10% curiosity per 12 months to Cardi B after the 2 agreed to relinquish the power to file future motions on the case.
The settlement was first reported by trial lawyer Meghann Cuniff.
Cardi B took the stand in Santa Ana, California, in October to defend herself after Brophy, who initially sought $5 million in damages from the rapper, argued {that a} slightly-altered picture of the tiger used on his tattoo imposed on a person giving Cardi B oral intercourse in a limousine — as depicted on the album cowl — “devalued” his artwork. Brophy’s tattoo was designed by artist Tim Hendricks and took months to finish, in line with the lawsuit.
Cardi B’s legal professionals argued that the artwork fell underneath truthful use, that Brophy didn’t undergo because of the lawsuit, and that nobody related the album artwork with him.
A jury sided with Cardi B, however Brophy later requested Carney to reevaluate the ruling. The decide upheld the jury’s determination, writing that it was cheap for the jury to conclude that audiences wouldn’t conflate the person on Cardi B’s album artwork with Brophy.
Brophy’s legal professionals filed a movement for a brand new trial in January — arguing that they had been unable to adequately cross-examine Cardi B throughout their authentic trial — but it surely was withdrawn on account of the settlement.
Legal professionals for Cardi B and Brophy didn’t instantly reply to Insider’s request for remark.
